Rape kill, won the death
penalty, adjudged the President George w. Yesterday, yunnan, vice President of the Supreme Court
TianChengYou says social need more reason some, not in a public carnival type
method to sentenced to a man to death, and this is the law for the defiled. He
said the case 10 years later would be a benchmarking. If from LiChangKui case
progress, the vice President of the Supreme NBA Jerseys Court does not seem to have what
words of deficiency, but the high court to the outside world in yunnan 12,
declared, "will be in the day that the results of the review of the
LiChangKui reported case of misinformation about the media, LiChangKui case
review is not yet over. That is, the current review of the case are still in
progress, in a related facts and the law applicable according to whether biased
quite place all have no conclusion. As the vice President of the Supreme Court
about, "not because all the anger, the random kill a person, in the end,
the judge or want to the laws of the country as the base." But, in the
relevant examination haven't before the dust settles, apparently couldn't tell
opinion must be and legal principle, everyone's anger also is not necessarily "optional".
This time, will the public opinion and the judge according to oppose,
apparently lack of facts support. Also, then let alone the case will not
"become a benchmarking", because we can neither because people anger
will be a sin not as good as dead people to death penalty field, more not
because they want a case become the so-called "benchmarking", let a
the sin of man escaped death when due punishment. All standards, one should be
the facts and law, "benchmarking" or "typical" let it be,
all need to independent and objective investigation as support. As if the
remarks is only the vice President of the NFL Jerseys Supreme Court, the personal view, so
he "one man against all" courage is worth affirmation. But if the
remarks to a certain extent the Supreme Court on behalf of yunnan,
the public may also have reason to bear the heart, the high court by yunnan the objectivity
of the review will also will be affected? For LiChangKui case speaking, the
urgent task is not accused people "binge" or "rage," but
detailed public related as soon as possible results of the review.